当前位置:黑龙江地方站首页 > 龙江新闻 > 正文

福州第二医院做包皮手术好不好费用多少大河报福州做人授手术去那好

2019年07月20日 18:32:21    日报  参与评论()人

福州看不育哪里好福州复通手术医院Ronald Reagan: ;A Time for Choosing; ( October 27,1964, Los Angeles)Program Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, we take pride in presenting a thoughtful address by Ronald Reagan. Mr. Reagan:Reagan: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you and good evening. The sponsor has been identified, but unlike most television programs, the performer hasnt been provided with a script. As a matter of fact, I have been permitted to choose my own words and discuss my own ideas regarding the choice that we face in the next few weeks.I have spent most of my life as a Democrat. I recently have seen fit to follow another course. I believe that the issues confronting us cross party lines. Now, one side in this campaign has been telling us that the issues of this election are the maintenance of peace and prosperity. The line has been used, ;Weve never had it so good.;But I have an uncomfortable feeling that this prosperity isnt something on which we can base our hopes for the future. No nation in history has ever survived a tax burden that reached a third of its national income. Today, 37 cents out of every dollar earned in this country is the tax collectors share, and yet our government continues to spend 17 million dollars a day more than the government takes in. We havent balanced our budget 28 out of the last 34 years. Weve raised our debt limit three times in the last twelve months, and now our national debt is one and a half times bigger than all the combined debts of all the nations of the world. We have 15 billion dollars in gold in our treasury; we dont own an ounce. Foreign dollar claims are 27.3 billion dollars. And weve just had announced that the dollar of 1939 will now purchase 45 cents in its total value.As for the peace that we would preserve, I wonder who among us would like to approach the wife or mother whose husband or son has died in South Vietnam and ask them if they think this is a peace that should be maintained indefinitely. Do they mean peace, or do they mean we just want to be left in peace? There can be no real peace while one American is dying some place in the world for the rest of us. Were at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars, and its been said if we lose that war, and in so doing lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening. Well I think its time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that were intended for us by the Founding Fathers.Not too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro, and in the midst of his story one of my friends turned to the other and said, ;We dont know how lucky we are.; And the Cuban stopped and said, ;How lucky you are? I had someplace to escape to.; And in that sentence he told us the entire story. If we lose freedom here, theres no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth.And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people, is still the newest and the most unique idea in all the long history of mans relation to man.This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right. Well Id like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. Theres only an up or down -- [up] mans old -- old-aged dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. And regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course.In this vote-harvesting time, they use terms like the ;Great Society,; or as we were told a few days ago by the President, we must accept a greater government activity in the affairs of the people. But theyve been a little more explicit in the past and among themselves; and all of the things I now will e have appeared in print. These are not Republican accusations. For example, they have voices that say, ;The cold war will end through our acceptance of a not undemocratic socialism.; Another voice says, ;The profit motive has become outmoded. It must be replaced by the incentives of the welfare state.; Or, ;Our traditional system of individual freedom is incapable of solving the complex problems of the 20th century.; Senator Fullbright has said at Stanford University that the Constitution is outmoded. He referred to the President as ;our moral teacher and our leader,; and he says he is ;hobbled in his task by the restrictions of power imposed on him by this antiquated document.; He must ;be freed,; so that he ;can do for us; what he knows ;is best.; And Senator Clark of Pennsylvania, another articulate spokesman, defines liberalism as ;meeting the material needs of the masses through the full power of centralized government.;Well, I, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and women of this country, as ;the masses.; This is a term we havent applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, ;the full power of centralized government; -- this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments dont control things. A government cant control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy.Now, we have no better example of this than governments involvement in the farm economy over the last 30 years. Since 1955, the cost of this program has nearly doubled. One-fourth of farming in America is responsible for 85% of the farm surplus. Three-fourths of farming is out on the free market and has known a 21% increase in the per capita consumption of all its produce. You see, that one-fourth of farming -- thats regulated and controlled by the federal government. In the last three years weve spent 43 dollars in the feed grain program for every dollar bushel of corn we dont grow.Senator Humphrey last week charged that Barry Goldwater, as President, would seek to eliminate farmers. He should do his homework a little better, because hell find out that weve had a decline of 5 million in the farm population under these government programs. Hell also find that the Democratic administration has sought to get from Congress [an] extension of the farm program to include that three-fourths that is now free. Hell find that theyve also asked for the right to imprison farmers who wouldnt keep books as prescribed by the federal government. The Secretary of Agriculture asked for the right to seize farms through condemnation and resell them to other individuals. And contained in that same program was a provision that would have allowed the federal government to remove 2 million farmers from the soil.At the same time, theres been an increase in the Department of Agriculture employees. Theres now one for every 30 farms in the ed States, and still they cant tell us how 66 shiploads of grain headed for Austria disappeared without a trace and Billie Sol Estes never left shore.Every responsible farmer and farm organization has repeatedly asked the government to free the farm economy, but how -- who are farmers to know whats best for them? The wheat farmers voted against a wheat program. The government passed it anyway. Now the price of b goes up; the price of wheat to the farmer goes down.Meanwhile, back in the city, under urban renewal the assault on freedom carries on. Private property rights [are] so diluted that public interest is almost anything a few government planners decide it should be. In a program that takes from the needy and gives to the greedy, we see such spectacles as in Cleveland, Ohio, a million-and-a-half-dollar building completed only three years ago must be destroyed to make way for what government officials call a ;more compatible use of the land.; The President tells us hes now going to start building public housing units in the thousands, where heretofore weve only built them in the hundreds. But FHA [Federal Housing Authority] and the Veterans Administration tell us they have 120,000 housing units theyve taken back through mortgage foreclosure. For three decades, weve sought to solve the problems of unemployment through government planning, and the more the plans fail, the more the planners plan. The latest is the Area Redevelopment Agency.Theyve just declared Rice County, Kansas, a depressed area. Rice County, Kansas, has two hundred oil wells, and the 14,000 people there have over 30 million dollars on deposit in personal savings in their banks. And when the government tells you youre depressed, lie down and be depressed.We have so many people who cant see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one. So theyre going to solve all the problems of human misery through government and government planning. Well, now, if government planning and welfare had the answer -- and theyve had almost 30 years of it -- shouldnt we expect government to the score to us once in a while? Shouldnt they be telling us about the decline each year in the number of people needing help? The reduction in the need for public housing?But the reverse is true. Each year the need grows greater; the program grows greater. We were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed hungry each night. Well that was probably true. They were all on a diet. But now were told that 9.3 million families in this country are poverty-stricken on the basis of earning less than 3,000 dollars a year. Welfare spending [is] 10 times greater than it was in the dark depths of the Depression. Were spending 45 billion dollars on welfare. Now do a little arithmetic, and youll find that if we divided the 45 billion dollars up equally among those 9 million poor families, wed be able to give each family 4,600 dollars a year. And this added to their present income should eliminate poverty. Direct aid to the poor, however, is only running only about 600 dollars per family. It would seem that someplace there must be some overhead.Now -- so now we declare ;war on poverty,; or ;You, too, can be a Bobby Baker.; Now do they honestly expect us to believe that if we add 1 billion dollars to the 45 billion were spending, one more program to the 30-odd we have -- and remember, this new program doesnt replace any, it just duplicates existing programs -- do they believe that poverty is suddenly going to disappear by magic? Well, in all fairness I should explain there is one part of the new program that isnt duplicated. This is the youth feature. Were now going to solve the dropout problem, juvenile delinquency, by reinstituting something like the old CCC camps [Civilian Conservation Corps], and were going to put our young people in these camps. But again we do some arithmetic, and we find that were going to spend each year just on room and board for each young person we help 4,700 dollars a year. We can send them to Harvard for 2,700! Course, dont get me wrong. Im not suggesting Harvard is the answer to juvenile delinquency.But seriously, what are we doing to those we seek to help? Not too long ago, a judge called me here in Los Angeles. He told me of a young woman whod come before him for a divorce. She had six children, was pregnant with her seventh. Under his questioning, she revealed her husband was a laborer earning 250 dollars a month. She wanted a divorce to get an 80 dollar raise. Shes eligible for 330 dollars a month in the Aid to Dependent Children Program. She got the idea from two women in her neighborhood whod aly done that very thing.Yet anytime you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, were denounced as being against their humanitarian goals. They say were always ;against; things -- were never ;for; anything.Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that theyre ignorant; its just that they know so much that isnt so.Now -- were for a provision that destitution should not follow unemployment by reason of old age, and to that end weve accepted Social Security as a step toward meeting the problem.But were against those entrusted with this program when they practice deception regarding its fiscal shortcomings, when they charge that any criticism of the program means that we want to end payments to those people who depend on them for a livelihood. Theyve called it ;insurance; to us in a hundred million pieces of literature. But then they appeared before the Supreme Court and they testified it was a welfare program. They only use the term ;insurance; to sell it to the people. And they said Social Security dues are a tax for the general use of the government, and the government has used that tax. There is no fund, because Robert Byers, the actuarial head, appeared before a congressional committee and admitted that Social Security as of this moment is 298 billion dollars in the hole. But he said there should be no cause for worry because as long as they have the power to tax, they could always take away from the people whatever they needed to bail them out of trouble. And theyre doing just that.A young man, 21 years of age, working at an average salary -- his Social Security contribution would, in the open market, buy him an insurance policy that would guarantee 220 dollars a month at age 65. The government promises 127. He could live it up until hes 31 and then take out a policy that would pay more than Social Security. Now are we so lacking in business sense that we cant put this program on a sound basis, so that people who do require those payments will find they can get them when theyre due -- that the cupboard isnt bare?Barry Goldwater thinks we can.At the same time, cant we introduce voluntary features that would permit a citizen who can do better on his own to be excused upon presentation of evidence that he had made provision for the non-earning years? Should we not allow a widow with children to work, and not lose the benefits supposedly paid for by her deceased husband? Shouldnt you and I be allowed to declare who our beneficiaries will be under this program, which we cannot do? I think were for telling our senior citizens that no one in this country should be denied medical care because of a lack of funds. But I think were against forcing all citizens, regardless of need, into a compulsory government program, especially when we have such examples, as was announced last week, when France admitted that their Medicare program is now bankrupt. Theyve come to the end of the road.In addition, was Barry Goldwater so irresponsible when he suggested that our government give up its program of deliberate, planned inflation, so that when you do get your Social Security pension, a dollar will buy a dollars worth, and not 45 cents worth?I think were for an international organization, where the nations of the world can seek peace. But I think were against subordinating American interests to an organization that has become so structurally unsound that today you can muster a two-thirds vote on the floor of the General Assembly among nations that represent less than 10 percent of the worlds population. I think were against the hypocrisy of assailing our allies because here and there they cling to a colony, while we engage in a conspiracy of silence and never open our mouths about the millions of people enslaved in the Soviet colonies in the satellite nations.I think were for aiding our allies by sharing of our material blessings with those nations which share in our fundamental beliefs, but were against doling out money government to government, creating bureaucracy, if not socialism, all over the world. We set out to help 19 countries. Were helping 107. Weve spent 146 billion dollars. With that money, we bought a 2 million dollar yacht for Haile Selassie. We bought dress suits for Greek undertakers, extra wives for Kenya[n] government officials. We bought a thousand TV sets for a place where they have no electricity. In the last six years, 52 nations have bought 7 billion dollars worth of our gold, and all 52 are receiving foreign aid from this country.No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. So.governments programs, once launched, never disappear.Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life well ever see on this earth.Federal employees -- federal employees number two and a half million; and federal, state, and local, one out of six of the nations work force employed by government. These proliferating bureaus with their thousands of regulations have cost us many of our constitutional safeguards. How many of us realize that today federal agents can invade a mans property without a warrant? They can impose a fine without a formal hearing, let alone a trial by jury? And they can seize and sell his property at auction to enforce the payment of that fine. In Chico County, Arkansas, James Wier over-planted his rice allotment. The government obtained a 17,000 dollar judgment. And a U.S. marshal sold his 960-acre farm at auction. The government said it was necessary as a warning to others to make the system work.Last February 19th at the University of Minnesota, Norman Thomas, six-times candidate for President on the Socialist Party ticket, said, ;If Barry Goldwater became President, he would stop the advance of socialism in the ed States.; I think thats exactly what he will do.But as a former Democrat, I can tell you Norman Thomas isnt the only man who has drawn this parallel to socialism with the present administration, because back in 1936, Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his Party was taking the Party of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. And he walked away from his Party, and he never returned til the day he died -- because to this day, the leadership of that Party has been taking that Party, that honorable Party, down the road in the image of the labor Socialist Party of England.Now it doesnt require expropriation or confiscation of private property or business to impose socialism on a people. What does it mean whether you hold the deed to the -- or the title to your business or property if the government holds the power of life and death over that business or property? And such machinery aly exists. The government can find some charge to bring against any concern it chooses to prosecute. Every businessman has his own tale of harassment. Somewhere a perversion has taken place. Our natural, unalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment.Our Democratic opponents seem unwilling to debate these issues. They want to make you and I believe that this is a contest between two men -- that were to choose just between two personalities.Well what of this man that they would destroy -- and in destroying, they would destroy that which he represents, the ideas that you and I hold dear? Is he the brash and shallow and trigger-happy man they say he is? Well Ive been privileged to know him ;when.; I knew him long before he ever dreamed of trying for high office, and I can tell you personally Ive never known a man in my life I believed so incapable of doing a dishonest or dishonorable thing.This is a man who, in his own business before he entered politics, instituted a profit-sharing plan before unions had ever thought of it. He put in health and medical insurance for all his employees. He took 50 percent of the profits before taxes and set up a retirement program, a pension plan for all his employees. He sent monthly checks for life to an employee who was ill and couldnt work. He provides nursing care for the children of mothers who work in the stores. When Mexico was ravaged by the floods in the Rio Grande, he climbed in his airplane and flew medicine and supplies down there.An ex-GI told me how he met him. It was the week before Christmas during the Korean War, and he was at the Los Angeles airport trying to get a ride home to Arizona for Christmas. And he said that [there were] a lot of servicemen there and no seats available on the planes. And then a voice came over the loudspeaker and said, ;Any men in uniform wanting a ride to Arizona, go to runway such-and-such,; and they went down there, and there was a fellow named Barry Goldwater sitting in his plane. Every day in those weeks before Christmas, all day long, hed load up the plane, fly it to Arizona, fly them to their homes, fly back over to get another load.During the hectic split-second timing of a campaign, this is a man who took time out to sit beside an old friend who was dying of cancer. His campaign managers were understandably impatient, but he said, ;There arent many left who care what happens to her. Id like her to know I care.; This is a man who said to his 19-year-old son, ;There is no foundation like the rock of honesty and fairness, and when you begin to build your life on that rock, with the cement of the faith in God that you have, then you have a real start.; This is not a man who could carelessly send other peoples sons to war. And that is the issue of this campaign that makes all the other problems Ive discussed academic, unless we realize were in a war that must be won.Those who would trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state have told us they have a utopian solution of peace without victory. They call their policy ;accommodation.; And they say if well only avoid any direct confrontation with the enemy, hell forget his evil ways and learn to love us. All who oppose them are indicted as warmongers. They say we offer simple answers to complex problems. Well, perhaps there is a simple answer -- not an easy answer -- but simple: If you and I have the courage to tell our elected officials that we want our national policy based on what we know in our hearts is morally right.We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now enslaved behind the Iron Curtain, ;Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skins, were willing to make a deal with your slave masters.; Alexander Hamilton said, ;A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.; Now lets set the record straight. Theres no argument over the choice between peace and war, but theres only one guaranteed way you can have peace -- and you can have it in the next second -- surrender.Admittedly, theres a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face -- that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand -- the ultimatum. And what then -- when Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that were retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the final ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary, because by that time we will have been weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side hes heard voices pleading for ;peace at any price; or ;better Red than dead,; or as one commentator put it, hed rather ;live on his knees than die on his feet.; And therein lies the road to war, because those voices dont speak for the rest of us.You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin -- just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didnt die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well its a simple answer after all.You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, ;There is a price we will not pay.; ;There is a point beyond which they must not advance.; And this -- this is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwaters ;peace through strength.; Winston Churchill said, ;The destiny of man is not measured by material computations. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn were spirits -- not animals.; And he said, ;Theres something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.;You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.Well preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or well sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.We will keep in mind and remember that Barry Goldwater has faith in us. He has faith that you and I have the ability and the dignity and the right to make our own decisions and determine our own destiny.Thank you very much. /201205/182116福州晋安区性激素检查 龙岩那个医院结扎复通

福州做输卵管修复手术医院排名In his latest such conversation, President Obama joined Congressional leaders and middle school children to congratulate astronauts aboard the International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Endeavour during a call from the Roosevelt Room of the White House:I just wanted to let you guys know how proud we are of all of you at what you guys have been accomplishing. I've had a chance to take a look at what Tranquility Module is doing. Everybody here back home is excited about this bay on the world that you guys are opening up, and Stephen Colbert at least is excited about his tmill. And so we just wanted to let you know that the amazing work that's being done on the International Space Station not only by our American astronauts but also our colleagues from Japan and Russia is just a testimony to the human ingenuity; a testimony to extraordinary skill and courage that you guys bring to bear; and is also a testimony to why continued space exploration is so important, and is part of the reason why my commitment to NASA is unwavering.201002/96708福州去那人工授孕比较好 What makes the world go round?Love?Money ?Energy ?Or science and technology ?是什么东西让世界延续?爱?金钱?能源?还是科学技术?Yes ,all of them ,but theres another important element, the spirit of courage and determination .是的,所有这些东西,但还有另外一个关键的因素,勇气和决心。To illustrate this ,let me share a true story .为了实这一点,让我与大家分享一个真实的故事。Once there was a young girl who dreamed of becoming the best swimmer in the world .以前有一个女孩梦想成为世界最优秀的游泳运动员。Driven by the dream,she practiced hard.Each day ,she swam twice or even three times further than the distance a football player covers on the ground during a match .在这个梦想的驱动下,她努力训练。她每天游两次,甚至三次,距离比一个足球运动员在一场比赛中所跑过的还长。She quietly continued with her training ,and finally,won a gold medal in the 1992 Olympic in Barcelona.她静静地继续着训练,终于在一九九二年巴赛罗那奥运会上夺得金牌,This woman is my hero,Lin Li.这个女人是我的偶像,名叫林莉。When I first entered middle school in 1994 ,I found it hard to cope with the pressure and fell behind the class.当我在一九九四年刚进入高中时,我发现很难承受那种压力,而使学习跟不上。Then the school took us to interview LinLi.We watched her swim and then sat around the pool listening to her story .于是学校让我们去访问林莉,我们看着她游泳,然后围在游泳池边听她的故事。LinLi said plainly ,;During the match ,the only thing in my mind was to push through ,push through ,and make the best out of myself .;林莉平静地说:“比赛当中,我只有一个念头,向前,向前,发挥我最好的水平。”Her words echoed in my mind.I knew I ,too,could overcome the obstacles in my study ,as she did in her training .她的话在我的脑海中回响着,我知道我也能够克我学习上的困难,就像她在训练所做到的一样。Gradually ,I got used to middle school .One year later ,I won a scholarship.我逐渐适应高中生活,一年后,我拿到了奖学金。This was the first time I experienced the Olympic spirit.It was not intangible or distant as I had once thought.那是我第一次体验奥运精神,并不是我以前想的那么不可触知,那么遥远的。Rather ,it was the courage to meet the challenge head on ,to persevere,and to push oneself to the limit.相反,那是迎接挑战的勇气,坚持不懈,把自己推到极点。Indeed ,this is the spirit that unites us in striving for the best .A french major in my school won a silver medal in Mens Foil at the Sydney Olympics last year .真的,这是团结我们争取最好的精神。我校一名法语系的学生在去年的悉尼奥运会上夺得了男子花剑的银牌。He started to learn fencing at age ten and spent a great part of his life on our national fencing team.他十岁开始练剑术,在我们的国家剑术队里,他花了大量的时间。Now he always says:;I will learn French the way I learned fencing .;现在他总是说:“我会像学习剑术那样学习法语。”As his fellow students ,we have all heard how he learned fencing .About half a year before Sydney ,he injured his ligament during a match in Europe.作为他的校友,我们都听说了他是如何练习剑术的。大约去悉尼的半年前,他在欧洲的一次比赛中扭伤了韧带。The doctor advised him to have an operation .However ,since that would mean missing the Olympics,医生建议他做手术,但是这意味着要错过奥运会,he postponed the operation and continued his training with an injured leg.他推迟手术,带着伤腿继续训练。At our New Years party ,he thanked us for helping him make up the lessons after his return from Sydney.在我们的新年晚会上,他感谢我们在他从悉尼回来后帮他把功课赶上来。A classmate of his ,however ,said in reply,;You have done more for us than we have done for you ,because you have instilled in all of us the hardworking spirit of the Olympics.;然而他的一位同学回答说:“你为我们做的比我们为你做的多得多,因为你为我们所有人灌输了奥运会的刻苦努力的精神。”Yes, we need the Olympic spirit as we strive to get rid of poverty and build China into a modern country.是的,我们需要奥运精神,正如我们努力消除贫困,把中国建设成现代化国家一样。This is why many classmates and I regard ourselves as ;bid supporters,;and as one can see on our Olympics website,这是我和我的同学把我们自己看成申奥拥护者的原因,从我们的奥运会网战上,there are millions of us.Indeed ,we are y to live out this spirit .可以看到数百我们一样的人。真的,我们准备着让人在精神在。Yang Xia,a gold medallist in weight lifting,came from a Tujia minority village.杨霞一位举重运动的金牌得主,来自土家少数民族的村庄。When she went home after coming back from Sydney,a television crew followed her .当她从悉尼回家里,一队电视工作者跟随着她。So we saw on TV how she thanked the townfolk in her local dialect and how the entire village came out to welcome their daughter .所以我们可以从电视里看到她用家乡话感谢父老乡亲,整个村庄的人走出来迎接他们的女儿。She told the anchorman,;I can always see strength and encouragement in their eyes.;As a student can also see the strength and encouragement .她告诉主持人:“我总能在乡亲们的眼中看到力量和鼓励。”I can see them in the eyes of Yang Xia ,Lin Li and many other athletes.I can see them in the eyes of millions of Chinese people who support Beijings bid for the Olympics.我可以从杨霞,林莉和其他许我运动员眼中看到它们,我可以从无数持北京申奥的中国人眼中看到它们,I can see the determination and commitment with which China is marching into the 21st century .我们可以看到中国跨越二十一世纪的决心和承诺。Beijings bid drives us forward .It promotes the Olympic spirit in China.北京申奥促使我们前进,在中国宣扬了奥运精神,And it is a prophecy that China will contribute more to the world in this new century .Thank you.预示着中国将在新世纪里为世界作出更多贡献。谢谢。Judge:Thank you very much indeed contestant number two .Youve made ,a ,a very persuasive case indeed for explaining to us why it is that the Olympic spirit,评委:真的非常感谢二号选手,你用非常令我们折的方式,向我们解释了为什么奥运精神,um, helps people to achieve even more than they thought they could in whatever field they happen to be ,uh ,to be working in.能帮助人们,在他们涉足的任何领域里取得比他们认为的还要多的成就。But I wonder what sort of balance you think there should be for know athletes, um, in their ordinary lives,但我想知道你认为出了名的运动员在他们的日常生活中是如何平衡,between exercise and their work.What sort of balance should there be for all those of us who are not going to be participants in the Olympics between exercise and work?锻炼与工作,我们那些不参加奥运会的人该如何平衡锻炼与工作的?Long Xiang:Of course ,there should be a balance because the majority of us are not athletes and were not going to enter the Olympic games.龙翔:当然,那存在着平衡因为我们当中绝大多数人不参加奥运会。But as I mentioned the most important thing is the Olympic spirit.Actually there are a lot of people around us who have lived out the Olympic spirit in their lives,但正如我所提到的,最重要的是奥运精神。事实上,我们周围有很多人在他们的一生中都贯穿着奥运精神,who have applied Olympic spirit in their lives.Actually ,once I volunteered to work for a group of disabled people but though they cant move as freely as each of us ,那些人在他们在的一生中都运用着奥运精神。事实上,一次我志愿为残疾人士务,虽然他们不像我们每一个人那样可以自行动,but the passion ,the love ,they hold towards sports are no less than each of us .I remember that it was extremely hot day in summer time and I couldnt believe what we saw in front of me .但他们对运动的热爱和并不比我们每一个人少。我记得那是夏天异常炎热的一天,我难以相信我们眼前的一切,The room was not air conditioned but these people kept on training .Though theyre not going to participate in the Olympics games ,一间没有空调的房间里,这些人在继续训练着。虽然他们没有参加奥运会,but you can see sweat running all over their bodies soaking their T-shirts.但是你可以看到他们全身大汗,湿透了他们的T恤。But despite of this they kept on training .Many of them had got done a good job in their studies and their work.他们全然不顾,继续训练,他们许多人在学习上和工作上很出色。So ,I think a balance should be kept because we want to keep healthy to stay in good condition while doing sports.所以我们需要平衡因为我们需要在运动中保持健康,保持良好的状态。But the important thing is that we need to balance our study and our work.We need to apply the Olympic spirit ,either in the Olympic ,in the sports and in our life .Thank you .但重要的是我们需要在我们的学习和工作中得到平衡,我们需要在奥运会上,在运动中和我们的生活里运用奥运精神。谢谢。Judge :Thank you very much .Thank you contestant two .Um ,as an educator I was very delighted to hear ,评委:非常感谢。谢谢二号选手。作为一名教育者,我很高兴地听到,um, your concerns about education and the importance of education and ,uh ,China ,uh ,becoming a major world power .中国成为一个世界大国,你对教育和教育的重要性的关注,Um,I m particulary interested in the fact that you mentioned ,um ,the need for teachers in poverty areas ,我对你提到的事实特别感兴趣,那就是贫困地区对教师的需求,uh,especially with regard to teaching of , uh ,females.Uh,what do you consider to be the most important qualities that a teacher working in these poverty areas should have given the kinds of students that they are going to be working with?特别是关于女教师。你认为这些在贫困地区工作的,教育各种各样的学生的老师应该具备哪些最重要的素质?Long Xiang:I think to be a good teacher there are many qualities one should has.But the one I think the most important of all is the love towards the students.龙翔:我认为作为一名好老师需要许多方面的素质,但我认为最重要的是对学生的爱。And ,actually I believe no matter if a teacher who along the coastal area or in the western part of China,事实上,我相信无论一名老师是在沿海地区还是在中国的西部,as long as they have the love towards students and that can make a good teacher .只要爱护学生就是一名好老师。Actually when I was in the primary school one of my classmates parents had a divorce.事实上,我上小学时,我的一位同学的父母离婚了,The girl suffered terribly from this .Her academic performance failed dramatically.那个女孩为此伤心欲绝,她的学习成绩直线下降。But ,the teacher paid special attention to her ,to talk to her for hours ,and helped her with her study.但是老师对她特别关注,与她谈心数小时,帮助她解决学习困难。And I think for the teachers in the weatern part of China,of course, the most important quality is to love their students ,to care about their thoughts ,我认为对于中国西部的老师,当然最重要的素质是热爱学生,关心他们的思想,not only their academic performance ,but their development both physically and mentally .Thank you .不仅仅是他们的学习,而且是他们的身体和思想的成长,谢谢。Judge:Thank you .谢谢。10/86247福州去那家医院试管生男孩比较好

福州疏通输卵管哪家最好 The preeminent mission of our new government is to give all Americans an opportunity not a guarantee, but a real opportunity -- to build better lives.新政府的主要任务是给予每名公民机遇,而不是保,而是真正过上好日子的机会。Beyond that, my fellow citizens, the future is up to us.除此之外,同胞们,未来掌握在我们手里。Our founders taught us that the preservation of our liberty and our union depends upon responsible citizenship.开国元勋告诫我们,自由和团结依靠的是负责人的公民。And we need a new sense of responsibility for a new century.新世纪需要新责任感。There is work to do, work that government alone cannot do: teaching children to ; hiring people off welfare rolls;我们任重道远,但单靠政府无法完成,教授儿童读写,增加就业,减少低保人员;coming out from behind locked doors and shuttered windows to help reclaim our streets from drugs and gangs and crime; taking time out of our own lives to serve others.摆脱毒品犯罪等枷锁;贡献自己务他人。Each and every one of us, in our own way, must assume personal responsibility not only for ourselves and our families, but for our neighbors and our nation.我们每个人,都能够通过自己的方式来承担责任,不仅是对自己和家庭,还有我们的邻里,以及整个国家。Our greatest responsibility is to embrace a new spirit of community for a new century.我们最大的责任就是建设新世纪的新团体精神。For any one of us to succeed, we must succeed as one America.对于每个人的胜利,我们需要先让美国胜利。The challenge of our past remains the challenge of our future will we be one nation, one people, with one common destiny, or not?曾经的挑战仍是未来的挑战,我们是否要以一个国家,一个民族,一个目标而前行?Will we all come together, or come apart?是团结合作还是分崩离析?The divide of race has been Americas constant curse.种族问题一直是美国的长期问题。And each new wave of immigrants gives new targets to old prejudices.每次移民潮都会对旧偏见带来冲击。Prejudice and contempt, cloaked in the pretense of religious or political conviction are no different.带着宗教或政治面具的偏见和轻蔑也都是一丘之貉。These forces have nearly destroyed our nation in the past. They plague us still.这些差点摧毁了美国。他们依然缠绕着我们。03/442734闽清县做造影专科医院宁德检查卵巢那个医院最好

福州看妇科专业医院
福州检查男性不育大约多少钱
福州妇保医院做宫腔镜好不好费用多少康指南
福州人工受精专科医院
龙马新闻宁德做人工授精费用
三明市染色体检查到哪里好
福州检查封闭抗体那个医院最好
福州人民医院查染色体多少钱最新晚报福州博爱医院性激素六项检查费用
中国爱问福州去那测卵泡爱问分类
(责任编辑:图王)
 
五大发展理念

龙江会客厅

福州总院精子检查要多少钱
福州晋安博爱医院治疗弱精好不好 三明市那些医院备孕检查千龙解答 [详细]
福州结扎疏通多少钱
宁德孕前检查要多少钱 龙岩微创复通什么医院好 [详细]
福州那里打胎
龙岩去那家医院试管生男孩 当当在线福州做造影专科医院丽新闻 [详细]
福州博爱医院检查收费标准
排名问答福州市检查胎停去那最好 晋安博爱中医院服务怎么样天涯共享南平那个医院做人授手术 [详细]